2026-10-12 - Council Briefing

Summary

Written from auto-captions, which begin mid-meeting (the opening items and the first vote, a unanimous 6-0, are cut off). Eddie Bowling and Chuck George presented three concepts for Kern Street Redevelopment: a 24-unit condominium layout with HOA-maintained common areas, an 18-unit traditional lot plan, and a 20-unit small-lot plan with some cottage homes of about 900 sq ft on a new public street. Staff favored options two and three, noted the small-lot options need relief on rear setbacks, lot size and frontage (possibly through a cluster or planned unit development ordinance), and a show of hands among council members favored option three; staff will go back to the developer and aim to break ground within 12 months. Council then approved 6-0 a $365,480 contract with CPL for design and construction management of the Strickland Center and Carver Park project (Carver Park and Strickland Center Redevelopment) and 6-0 the temporary road closures for Chair City Christmas and the Star of Bethlehem drive-through nativity. The October 19 agenda was set: budget amendment 2027-P4-01, which moves $60,000 from contingency for the government relations contract, was split from the $800 beautification donations and both put on regular (Government Relations Lobbyist Contract); the Main Street map amendment, a vehicle safety and telematics policy, street naming, animal control, a call for a public hearing on an economic development grant for Project Bagel on November 16 also go on regular, while the sewer line cleaning and CCTV contract, the special event process and the loading zone ordinance go on consent. A closed session for personnel is planned for the next Monday, and proclamations for veterans green lights, domestic violence and learning disability awareness were assigned to Doug Hunt, Lisa Shell and Jacquelyn Johnson.

Source: auto-caption transcript of the YouTube upload of the October 12, 2026 Council Briefing.

Issues discussed: Kern Street Redevelopment, Carver Park and Strickland Center Redevelopment, Government Relations Lobbyist Contract

Transcript

These are auto-generated YouTube captions, so names and numbers are likely misheard.

Transcript

00:00of my changes in

00:10>> Is there any discussion?

00:13>> [clears throat]

00:13>> You may record your vote.

00:16I have six in the affirmative, so that's

00:18a unanimous decision.

00:21And it is approved.

00:23Uh we're now down to uh

00:26recognitions and presentations. I

00:28recognize our uh deputy city manager,

00:31Eddie Bowling.

00:33>> Mr. Mayor, if it's okay, I may present

00:35from here because my computer is going

00:36to die as soon as I unplug it. I didn't

00:38realize that before.

00:39>> Um I would ask that Chuck George come

00:41up. We're going to kind of walk through

00:42the Kern Street of redevelopment uh

00:44process.

00:46Um so you'll see in front of you the

00:48Kern Street redevelopment. What we

00:50wanted to provide with you was uh three

00:52different concepts. Uh Michael, Chuck,

00:54and I are here to answer any questions

00:55you may have, so we'll kind of walk

00:56through this very short presentation to

00:58give you some um respective concepts for

01:01the neighborhood. Um so what we want to

01:03do is talk about house production. Um

01:05before you today, we have three

01:06different options. One is a 20-house

01:08option, one is an 18-house option, and

01:11the last one is a 20-house option.

01:13Originally during our discussions, you

01:15would looked at a 20-house option. Um so

01:17we were able to bring you three separate

01:19options.

01:20Uh for context, we are now live

01:23streaming, so we're good from that

01:24perspective. Um we want to talk about

01:26different types of ownership structures,

01:29um whether it's an HOA

01:31uh or it's property owned by the

01:32individual.

01:34Um talk about infrastructure burden,

01:36whether it's a city-owned street or a uh

01:38neighborhood-owned street. Uh what

01:40zoning path is necessary, and talk about

01:42long-term maintenance.

01:45Um so option one, two, and three are all

01:47presented here, and I'll break them down

01:48individually, uh the different concepts

01:50and plat plan alternatives. And

01:52obviously, Chuck will be here to answer

01:53any questions you may have.

01:56Number one is the highest density, so

01:58it's a condominium style neighborhood.

02:00Um it puts 24 units on the property. You

02:03can see there's a common area in between

02:06um the row of homes that face Kern

02:08Street and then a row of homes that face

02:10the new driveway.

02:12This produces the highest yield of homes

02:14in the property on the area. Um so

02:16there's no individual lot lines, the

02:18gardens and common areas will be

02:19maintained by an HOA.

02:21Um private driveways for the residents

02:23and it's not a public city street that

02:26crosses over from Cates to Leonard.

02:29Um and that would be an expected to move

02:31forward in the condominium style

02:32ordinance pathway. Um

02:35it does produce a higher yield, still

02:37has to go for the Board of Adjustments

02:39for Planning Board uh for adoption, but

02:42it does give you additional homes. Um

02:44this is worth mentioning um that it does

02:48produce some 900 square foot homes

02:50facing the driveway area that faces the

02:53Cates Avenue area.

02:54However, because it's HOA maintained,

02:58all of the property being maintained by

02:59the HOA it'd have the highest HOA cost.

03:02And so in in the essence if we're trying

03:04to run down the price of a home

03:07ownership or living in a neighborhood,

03:09then this may have an effect. You know,

03:11we increase density, however, because

03:13they're maintaining the storm water

03:14pond,

03:15uh and then the public areas or the the

03:17neighborhood areas around the homes,

03:19there may be higher than normal HOA fees

03:21because of that.

03:23>> [snorts]

03:24>> Option two is a traditional individual

03:26lot plan, so they would own their own

03:27lots, they would own their own home. Uh

03:29there's 18 units and as you can probably

03:31see it may be challenging, but um these

03:34are all based on 1,200 square foot

03:35homes.

03:37And um it does produce the lowest yield

03:40out of all three options. Um you do have

03:42individual home ownership, so they do

03:44maintain their yard. Uh there's a new

03:46internal roadway that would be a public

03:48city street that goes from Cates Avenue

03:51to Leonard. It does meet the R-6

03:53framework with two exceptions. One,

03:56uh rear yard setback, and then minimum

03:58lot size. We would have to go to the

04:00Board of Adjustments for those things.

04:03Um

04:04Chuck, do you want to talk about the pud

04:06and that way we can kind of talk about

04:07it that's direction. Uh this is

04:09applicable for option two and three.

04:11>> Well, basically we would have to create

04:13an ordinance

04:14for cluster development

04:16uh to be able to reduce the size of the

04:20uh square footage of the lots for the

04:22homes to be built on. And then the

04:24frontage of the

04:25uh the property line as well. Maybe

04:27reduce it down to a 35-ft street front

04:30or something of that sort depending on

04:32the details of the concept we want to go

04:34with.

04:36>> Okay.

04:37Okay.

04:38>> Option three um is moderate density

04:40small lot plan again. So, this reduces

04:42lot size down it mimics some of what you

04:45saw in option one. So, we get some homes

04:47that are around the 900 sq ft area. Uh

04:49but it does get to the 20 yield that you

04:51originally talked about having. Uh this

04:54um does again have individual home

04:56ownership uh where they'll maintain

04:58their yards. It is a city public street.

05:01Um there would be relief required for

05:02rear setbacks, lot size, and then also

05:05for frontage. Um as Chuck mentioned, I

05:07think the frontage was 50 ft we would

05:09have to drop it down to probably 35 ft.

05:11>> Mhm.

05:11>> Um so, it does balance density and it

05:13balances home ownership.

05:16So, um

05:17again, I think you could do a planned

05:19unit development on option three as

05:20well, correct, Chuck?

05:21>> Correct.

05:22>> And um

05:24so, I think that's obviously an option.

05:26Depends on what density you're looking

05:27for.

05:27>> the HOA. How much are you talking about

05:30from the HOA fee standpoint?

05:32>> It's hard to

05:33>> sure on that what the fees would be.

05:35>> It's going to be hard to say, but again,

05:37if we're trying to drive down the cost

05:38of home ownership, that's that's another

05:40factor that we know will be there.

05:42Um we've talked about we saw other units

05:44at 50 $50 a month to $100 a month. We

05:48expected it would be on the higher end

05:50because not only are they maintaining

05:51the exterior of the structure, the lots,

05:53the sidewalks that goes in between, and

05:56then additionally the um storm water

05:57pond. So, there's a lot to think a lot

05:59of things that need to be maintained um

06:02as a result of that.

06:03We don't have that number. Again, it's

06:05something you can look at if you choose

06:07to.

06:07Uh

06:08>> Doug, in comparison, think about Royal

06:11Manor out on 62. Royal Manor, those are

06:13patio homes. I think there's 52 doors

06:16there. I'm doing that by memory.

06:19They were maintaining the exteriors of

06:22the structures. They were maintaining

06:24sidewalks, and they're in charge of

06:25maintaining their streets. They do not

06:27have the funds to keep up their streets.

06:29Their HOA dues are currently $100 a

06:31month. They could not afford to maintain

06:33the exteriors of the property, so

06:35they've had to amend their covenants to

06:37make the actual homeowners responsible

06:39for uh

06:40taking care of the exteriors. And it's

06:42been an issue. But there if if there's

06:45street issues, there's not going to be

06:46any money there to to repair those

06:47streets. And that's at $100 a month, so

06:49that's just something to think about.

06:53Um so, we wanted to talk about the three

06:55different options, put them in front of

06:56you just all on a one-pager, so you can

06:58kind of give you an idea of what we're

06:59[clears throat] looking at. Um

07:02Michael, uh Chuck and I did talk about

07:04what options we thought would probably

07:06best for the neighborhood. We talked

07:07about option two and option three

07:09primarily because it does meet the

07:11council goals for homeownership. Option

07:15three does reduce the size of some of

07:17the properties to around a 900 square

07:18foot home, which was also a priority of

07:21council. Uh they are cottage style

07:23homes. Um we think that would be the

07:25most cost affordable um while trying to

07:28meet the intent of putting 20 lots on

07:30the property.

07:33And happy to entertain questions, uh but

07:36our goal today is to come up with a head

07:38nod or majority vote of council to say

07:41we like option one, two, or three. We

07:43would go back to McGill to begin the

07:45development

07:46uh and then proceed forward with the and

07:48try to break ground within 12 months.

07:51>> Perfect. I'm excited about this. This

07:53has been a long time coming with this

07:54project. Um and I appreciate this

07:56breakdown you gave for us, Eddie.

07:58Personally, I'm with, you know, hearing

07:59some of the

08:01set priorities that we've met, option

08:02three just sounds the most feasible with

08:04really helping ensure that we can

08:06increase that home ownership while also

08:08giving some of that diversity within the

08:09housing um for some of those working

08:11families. Um so, personally, I think um

08:14option three is going to be really more

08:15beneficial for us.

08:17Um and then if I had to choose a second

08:18favorite, I guess that'd be option two.

08:20>> I'm okay with either two or three.

08:22>> How many of the homes in option three

08:25are the like 900 square feet versus the

08:28>> There's

08:29uh eight plus three, six, nine across

08:31the front

08:32>> Okay.

08:32>> uh that face the new street, which is

08:34where Kate's Avenue is.

08:35>> Okay.

08:36>> That's in option three.

08:37>> Okay.

08:38And the rest of them are

08:40>> Yeah, so when you look at the back,

08:41you'll see those are 30 by 40, so those

08:43are 1,200 square feet and there's seven

08:45across the back.

08:47And then four uh adjacent to the

08:49stormwater pond. It's kind of

08:50challenging to see on this slide.

08:52>> No, it's great.

08:58>> They're one and two bedroom homes.

09:01>> I like the two different sizes.

09:02>> I'm good with that.

09:04I'm good with that.

09:08>> That's a public street.

09:12And we just need to

09:13adjust our ordinance, probably create a

09:15pad for this area or cluster development

09:18for each type homes to meet the minimum

09:19square footage of 3,340

09:22ft that's being requested here.

09:25And then uh 18th uh

09:26reducing a setback to 18 ft, maybe 15 ft

09:30instead of a 25 minute requirement on

09:32our ordinance.

09:33>> Do you want to listen?

09:35>> So, really not the

09:37the only

09:39difference between

09:41the only difference really between two

09:43and three

09:45would be

09:47the number of units and some of them

09:49would be just a little smaller in the

09:51front than the ones in the back.

09:53>> Correct. Yeah. Yeah, so the road

09:54frontage on option three gets smaller

09:57because you're increasing the density by

09:59two homes.

10:00>> Okay.

10:01>> Correct.

10:03>> And I think we talked about this

10:05already, but we would not probably be

10:06able to start in like the upper right

10:09corner

10:11until the whole site has been graded and

10:14prepped, right?

10:15>> That's going to be a decision by McGill

10:17cuz because they have so many things

10:19they have to go in to it. I don't know

10:22if they go to the planning board and

10:23approve it all at one time. Chuck, do

10:24you want to speak to that?

10:26>> Normally the

10:27development this sort of goes to the

10:29planning board for approval first. Uh

10:31they have to see uh the

10:33preliminary of the project and normally

10:36they'll go ahead and do the complete

10:37construction plan

10:39for Once that's approved, then the

10:40complete construction plan would be

10:41done. But it could be broken up in phase

10:43once the construction plans are

10:45completed and approved. You can uh do

10:47that per station as phase one, then uh

10:49lower

10:50the middle section as phase two, and

10:52then the lower section maybe as phase

10:54three, but the pond and the

10:56going probably at that point in time

10:58because you can That's when you get your

11:00high density once you start developing

11:02the lower portion of the property.

11:11>> You mean two or I I like three. I like

11:13the the variety of options.

11:15Um

11:16personally, that's my number one.

11:20>> I have a question.

11:21Would that storm water pond back there,

11:25would that help with the issue that

11:29Nat was talking about at the cemetery.

11:34>> No.

11:36That's the collection of the water just

11:37from this site.

11:39>> Okay.

11:42We talked about this I think at like my

11:44very first council meeting.

11:46And I'm so excited.

11:48It's going to be awesome.

11:51>> We're excited to do something like it's

11:52the first time we've been able to

11:53develop an airport. So we're very

11:54excited to

11:55>> This is

11:56This is not something that towns of

11:58Thomasville size typically do. So,

12:01good job.

12:09>> Looking at show of hands to see

12:11where we're at to give them some

12:12directions. So I would definitely put

12:14that vote out there for option three to

12:16give us some of that variety of sub that

12:18housing while also providing still those

12:2120 units.

12:32>> That's great. That's the direction we

12:33need. We appreciate it. We'll get with

12:34Miguel and move forward in that

12:36direction. Thank you.

12:37Yes.

12:43We're now down to regular agenda for

12:45this evening and these do require votes.

12:48So the

12:504A is consideration of contract with CPL

12:54for

12:54architectural and engineering design

12:57services for the Regi- Registrickland

13:00Community Center and Carver Park

13:02project. Mr. City Manager.

13:06>> Thank you, Mayor.

13:08This is the contract basically for

13:11establishing both the detailed

13:14engineering design work that has to be

13:15done

13:16based on the preliminary work that that

13:18you've approved

13:20and the construction management once we

13:22get it under contract. So it's so this

13:25is a contract for $365,480

13:29with CPL to manage those two portions.

13:34That

13:35That's about Well, we're figuring about

13:378% of the cost of construction and

13:41which is in line with typical services

13:43of this sort. We've had success with

13:46CPL. We've They've already been doing

13:49phase one work.

13:50So, we do recommend that you approve

13:53this contract. And this allows us to

13:56start the next phase and they are doing

13:59going to be doing their best to meet our

14:00time frame so that we can expend the

14:05grant funds

14:06as fast as possible which of course this

14:09would be part of the grant funds this

14:11cost.

14:13So, I ask for you to approve that this

14:15evening.

14:15>> Okay, what's pleasure of council?

14:17>> Mr. Mayor, I make a motion that we

14:19approve the contract for CPL for

14:20architecture and engineering design

14:22services for the Regional Strickland

14:23Center.

14:25>> Second.

14:26>> Okay, we have a motion second any

14:27discussion?

14:32Okay, you may record your votes.

14:36I have six zeros so that has been

14:38approved.

14:41Item 4B is consideration of temporary

14:44road closure ordinances

14:46for Chair City Christmas and Star

14:48Bethlehem Drive-Through Nativity.

14:52Mr. City Manager.

14:53>> Thank you, sir. These are

14:56events that have going have been going

14:58on for a couple of years. Well, the Star

15:01Bethlehem for many years the Chair City

15:03for the last couple years

15:05in our organization. They're They're

15:06requesting the same street closures as

15:09they have in past years

15:11and do recommend approval for these two.

15:14And again, the reason why we're

15:15approving it tonight is that we have to

15:17submit these to the state because the

15:19state roads are being closed and we're

15:21close to the timing

15:23where that will be an issue if we don't

15:24get them approved.

15:26>> Okay.

15:27All right, having heard this uh what's

15:29the pleasure of council?

15:31>> Mr. Mayor, I'm

15:32uh move that we approve the temporary

15:34road closures for Star of Bethlehem and

15:38Light Up the Holidays.

15:39>> Is there a second?

15:40>> Second.

15:41>> Chair City Chair

15:42>> Chair City

15:43>> We've already done Light Up the

15:44Holidays.

15:44>> Oh, god. Chair City Christmas.

15:46>> Lots of fun.

15:47>> Yay.

15:49>> Who's that?

15:53>> Just pick one.

15:55>> Okay, we have a motion and a second. Any

15:57discussion?

16:00Okay, you may vote.

16:03And I have six zeros, so that has been

16:06approved.

16:07Uh next item for our meeting next week

16:09will be the public forum.

16:11It'll be a 2-minute time limit for the

16:13subject of the speaker's choice.

16:16Uh

16:17item six, recognition and presentations.

16:20Uh we will have a resolution uh in

16:22support of the green light for veterans,

16:25November 3rd through 10th.

16:27Uh

16:29Council member Doug Hunt will do that

16:30one.

16:32We have a domestic violence

16:34proclamation, uh Council member Lisa

16:36Shell

16:37will do that one.

16:38And we have a proclamation learning

16:41disability awareness month, Council

16:43member Jacquelyn Johnson will do that

16:45one.

16:45Thank y'all very much.

16:47Okay, we're now down to our consent

16:49agenda. I'm going to recognize our city

16:51manager once again to take us through

16:53the remainder of this.

16:54>> Uh can I just ask a question about the

16:56the three uh resolutions? Uh

16:59we'll light up uh city hall with green

17:02lights during the the period 3rd through

17:0510th. Uh right now we're lit up with

17:07pink lights. Uh we may change that to

17:09orange or purple or something for

17:11Halloween. Um

17:13for domestic violence, is there a color

17:16>> Purple.

17:17>> Purple, that's what I was I was thinking

17:18it was purple but I wasn't positive.

17:20Um so after we do the green lights, I'll

17:23switch to purple.

17:24Um and then does anyone know does

17:27learning disability have a a color?

17:29>> It's multiple colors like a rainbow.

17:32Uh like red, orange, yellow.

17:34>> Uh we we I

17:35Can we control those individual windows,

17:38Eddie, uh with different lights?

17:40>> Yeah, we'll change them when we want.

17:41>> Okay, so we'll at some point in in some

17:44point in November we'll we'll transfer

17:46to it

17:47that to celebrate that.

17:49>> That's in October.

17:51>> Is that Oh, in October. Well, let's see.

17:53Green lights in November, domestic

17:55violence is is This This month. Okay, so

17:58then we'll switch

18:00we'll switch um sometime between the

18:0215th and 20th to to purple and run it

18:05for the rest of the month. And then

18:07disability Oh, no.

18:10Oh, man. There's too many things going

18:11on. All right, we'll figure it out.

18:13>> So can we do them I mean I'm I'm okay if

18:16y'all are okay with like doing purple

18:18for a week and then switch it over to

18:21Jaquesa's and then y'all can for a week

18:23and then um

18:24>> Yeah, we've already been doing it for

18:2710 days

18:28for for

18:29>> And folks have been loving it. So I I I

18:31love the little creative idea with the

18:32LED lights. It really is awesome.

18:34>> Okay. All right, we'll do 10 10 10.

18:37See if that'll work out.

18:39All right.

18:40>> All right, sounds good.

18:42>> Well, we don't have to worry about

18:46green light until November.

18:48>> Right.

18:51>> So okay.

18:54Okay, I'm sorry. Uh consent agenda. So

18:57the two items on your consent agenda are

18:59consideration of minutes of the briefing

19:01and committee meetings uh from September

19:0314th. That's item A. Item B is

19:06consideration of minutes of the council

19:07meeting September 21st um 2026.

19:12And then uh,

19:13then your regular agenda for, uh, next

19:16month, excuse me, next week is, um,

19:19item A is consideration of budget

19:21amendment 2027-P4-01.

19:24Uh, Thomas A. Vantis here. Uh, this was

19:27not on the committees because action at

19:29the committee affected this. So, give

19:32you a quick overview.

19:34>> Good afternoon, Mayor and Council.

19:36>> Thank you.

19:36>> This budget amendment is added, um, to

19:38appropriate or to transfer $60,000 from

19:41general fund contingency for the

19:42government relations, uh, contractual

19:44agreement. And it also appropriates

19:47$800, uh, of contributions for the Light

19:50Up the Holidays event in the

19:51beautification fund.

19:55>> Thank you.

19:56>> Would you like that to be

19:57consent?

19:58>> Consent or regular agenda?

20:00>> I'm voting consent.

20:01>> So, this No, regular. Um, so, this

20:03budget amendment, is it going to be,

20:05uh, together?

20:07>> No, that Well, it's one budget

20:09amendment. Um,

20:10yes, so, it would be together.

20:12>> Is no way to split the two? Like, how

20:15are we, cuz if if we vote or don't or

20:18disagree with one of the

20:19items, but want the transfer for the

20:22money?

20:23>> We If that's the case, then we could go

20:26ahead and divide it into two different

20:27budget amendments.

20:30That's just paperwork.

20:33>> Okay.

20:34>> Yeah.

20:35All right, so,

20:37note, two different

20:39two different items, both on regular. Do

20:42you want both of them on regular?

20:44>> Yes.

20:44>> Okay.

20:46So, it'll be A1 and A2 for right now.

20:49Yeah, just separate the two items.

20:52And when do we label label the first one

20:54A and the second one would become B on

20:56the regular or, yeah, on regular.

21:06Okay.

21:07Um, item B is consideration of award of

21:10service and maintenance contract for

21:11sewer line cleaning and CCTV TV inspect

21:15inspection.

21:19Consent?

21:21All right.

21:24Uh item C is consideration of amendment

21:27to the Main Street map.

21:29>> Regular.

21:34>> Okay.

21:36Item D is consideration of vehicle

21:38safety and telematics program policy.

21:41>> Regular.

21:43>> Okay.

21:45>> [snorts]

21:46>> Item E is consideration of amendment to

21:48special event approval process and

21:50application.

21:52>> Consent.

21:54>> Okay.

21:57Item F is consideration of street naming

22:00and address assignment ordinance.

22:02>> Regular.

22:07>> Item G is consideration of amendment to

22:09animal control ordinance.

22:11>> Regular.

22:12>> What you say?

22:13>> Regular.

22:21>> Um item H consideration of amendment to

22:24loading zone ordinance.

22:26>> Consent.

22:27>> Consent.

22:31>> And item I is call for public hearing

22:34regarding economic development grant for

22:35project bagel on November 16th.

22:39>> Regular.

22:46>> Okay, those are the items that I have. I

22:48will read over uh the

22:50consent and regular to confirm.

22:53Um consent agenda will be 7 A and B.

22:58And also 8

23:00B as currently written

23:03uh E

23:05and H.

23:07Uh everything else will be on regular.

23:10Everybody agree?

23:11>> [laughter]

23:11>> Okay.

23:13Okay.

23:14>> Give it back to you, Mayor.

23:15>> Okay, thank you very much. Then we'll

23:18after the uh agenda items are taken care

23:20of, we'll do our uh committee reports

23:22and assignments.

23:24And

23:26we will have a closed session for

23:28personnel

23:30on the next Monday.

23:32So, that takes us down to item E,

23:35additions and updates. Does anyone have

23:37anything for

23:40additions or updates?

23:43Okay, we're down to adjourned. Do I have

23:44a motion to adjourn?

23:46>> So moved.

23:47>> Second.

23:47>> I have a motion and a second.

23:50All in favor, say aye.

23:51>> Aye.

23:52>> Opposed, no.

23:54We're adjourned.

23:56>> Just a reminder,

23:57tomorrow I will be at a conference in

23:59Miami.

24:00Thursday and Friday, Friday I'm out of

24:02town